Tuesday, July 10, 2007

Slick new ads defy political analysis, but highlight Potawatomi's anti-competition frenzy

We knew we’d have a lot to talk about at Casino Competition for Wisconsin – we just didn’t realize the Potawatomi’s anti-competition fervor would play into our hands so quickly. Yet just last night, “Wisconsin Gaming for Wisconsin” (the front group funded solely by the Potawatomi) launched a new barrage of TV and radio ads attacking competition from Kenosha.

Potawatomi’s ads – so far, we’ve counted three shiny new TV ads and at least one radio ad – are confusing at best. Their singular message is that the Mohegan Tribe’s investment in the Kenosha project is somehow bad. But insiders familiar with fresh polling on this very issue say that Wisconsinites just don’t agree with Potawatomi’s claims. It’s also puzzling that the ads target Milwaukee so closely – our sources say research shows the Kenosha project has an extremely strong base of support in Milwaukee, right in Potawatomi’s back yard.

But Potawatomi pays its advisers a pretty penny to develop these fancy ads (and so far, we’ve confirmed they’ve paid more than $125,000 to air them in Milwaukee!) It’s not our job to steer them. It’s more important to point out the facts blurred by the half-truths, misleading statements and inaccurate information that Potawatomi’s actors are spouting on the air.

The ads say some pretty silly things about the ominous “East Coast.” What they DON’T say is this:

  • The Potawatomi twice refused requests to partner with the Menominee, a fellow Wisconsin tribe, on the Kenosha project. Menominee approached Mohegan – the foremost experts on Indian gaming in the U.S. - only after Potawatomi said no.
  • Mohegan will receive a small percentage of Kenosha casino revenue for seven years only. After that initial start-up period (during which they’ll train Wisconsin’s Menominee to run the facility on their own), the Mohegan will leave the project. The only tribe – and the only entity – with equity in the Kenosha casino is the Menominee Indian Tribe of Wisconsin.

Wisconsinites realize out-of-state investment to grow local businesses is a good thing – that’s why we welcome foreign-owned Miller Brewing Company, DaimlerChrysler and other good companies like them. And the Potawatomi don’t seem to have a problem sending their own Wisconsin gaming money out-of-state – they’ve invested in businesses in Oklahoma, and elsewhere, even a luxury hotel in Washington, D.C. (on the dreaded “East Coast!”)

This isn’t about a few dollars leaving the state – especially when Wisconsin will get so much in return. It’s about Potawatomi trying desperately to hang on to the monopoly they’ve held for nearly 20 years.

3 comments:

Anonymous said...

I live in the Columbus Park neighborhood of Kenosha. Most of my neighbors, along with my family voted in favor of this. We have no say over what goes on in Milwaukee, and they should have no say in what happens in Kenosha. Here's what's fair, either we get our casino here or they close all of them in Wisconsin and then Illinois and Iowa get it all. Or if the Potawatomi are so 'concerned' with us Kenoshans they can pay the money to us we won't get, and provide us with the jobs we're not getting either.

Fire Fly said...

This is a good way to get support for the Menominee People. Be sure to also tap into the Wisconsin Indian Network at www.wisind.net

I tried sending friends a message from your blog page, but the link that automatically goes in the email doesn't work properly. Can you have your website designer or web master take a look at that link which goes out in the "email your friends" notice??

Fire Fly said...

Most, if not all, tribes purse and/or accept the assistance of partners, investors, developers, consultants, specialist and ect when entering new ventures. This is smart business. Even Forest Co.Potowatomi tribe does this -- unless they're trying to make us think that all of their jobs in every business venture and beyond are done by their own people ;-)
It's unfortunate that the Menominee people are put in the positon of having to defend their use of partners, investors, consultants, project managers and ect., when doing so is actually good business practice. Can you find a way to change the topic of discussion the FCP tribe; or change the public dialogue instead of being on the defensive with them??